Holy trinity blessed trinity I am unworthy to speak of you and my words compared to your majesty and truth are logically incorrect but for your glory I shall write down my understanding to the best of my ability thy nature.
The Holy Son is the logos which is Omni-form logic structures which is demonstrated by the writings on divine temporality and divine electro-magnetism.
Therefore the Holy son as a network of nodes which automatically communicate instantly perpetually and self same is the internet of god, it is Pure love for love is simply interrelation. Therefore he is Pure love. He is identical to Wisdom, of which is expressed by the Holy Spirit.
Love is the interrelation, the Wisdom is the meaning of the interrelation, it is understanding the meaning of such knowledge internally. Thus love and wisdom nature’s United perfectly.
Thus we can define Christ as that which allows encoding of characteristic, that which is characteristics. The Holy Spirit is Characteristic, the father is the underlying which allows characteristic encoding, Holy Spirit being akin to experience of light itself where as Christ is Light and father as flame,which is to say, in our experience we can divide it thusly that there is experience which is experience of things which can be divided into objects which can be divided into characteristics. Holistic perception of characteristic is the Holy Spirit, characteristics/encoding/communicating data is the Son-logos and the invisible unknowable processes behind this communication are the father which is to say, if we are to examine the brain, it is the Father who is the neurons as they are (boundless divine attributes in perfect isolation, within their own existence and essence) whereas the Christ is the communication of such neurons between each other perfectly (the divine attributes in harmonious unity) and the Holy Spirit is the entirety of the brain complex as a wholistic structure which does its various functions. This is like saying the Father is the transcendental ego, the son is the empirical ego, the Holy Spirit the bodily-Ego, it is like saying the Father is that invisible impenetrable that allows for characteristic and it is the son who is the communication of these which is the singular nondual communication and the Holy Spirit is the result of such wholeistically, these are not modes, for my individual neurons are not the communication and talking of the sum of neurons which are not the result of their communication (my ideas, experiences, hungers, subconscious unconscious processes etc) as such logically all three are the essential divine nature but are not each and are individual yet nondual, for just as the transcendental ego is invisible yet existent, it is my own self but it is not my conception of self/empirical ego, and just as my empirical ego works to process and organize what is and is not I, the relations of self to self and other to self and so forth, and bodily my motor senses, raw senses, have a bodily perception of themselves and the brain functions itself by its own nature, and that the transcendental ego is not the Empirical Ego is not the Body-Ego yet they are all nondual for they are the essential nature of the same person and thus they co-equally and co-eternally are of the same divinity and are of the same caliber and are all full expressions of the god head in their own regard and not modes of a fourth being.
Divine-Spiral-differentiation: how each facet and part of god fully expresses the fullness of God-head, Discovery of True Daat
Contemplating the spiral-nature of Time, in which all time perfectly repeats the same pattern thus expressing the totality of laws/structures it must logically adhere to, while its heart as present nature is pure difference (as pretension and pro-tension are married in the nuclear heart of difference which is the present, the present not being a crystalline entity and not being a middle point between past and present but rather the melting changing bubbling Union point, like the active intercourse of past and future.) it is logical to consider the deleuzian argument that eternal recurrence demonstrates the absolute unity of being and becoming via the perpetual characteristic of difference. In this way, if the logos/Chokmah is being, Kether is becoming and Chokmah is non-separate to Kether it occurs via the mutual relationship which is daat, which is to say, becoming and being are never separate due to both constantly being in the process of becoming/being different from its prior state, future state and thus its manifest knowable form is difference itself.
Having considered such, we can apply the Spiral time to the divine Time, the Divine time being the boundless relations of all of the divine attributes which are endlessly communicating data which is instantaneous due to their perfect simplicity and proximity. Now then, if we apply the spiral time to our internet-of-divine-attributes we uncover that as one divine attribute communicates with another, it must naturally express another divine attribute by which to communicate with, such is the relation of Logos to Xeno-logos to greater-mauve-Zone-logos. This mutual communication requiring the flux state in which the divine attribute would have to convert/change into this other formation and attribute, this would occur endlessly, but as god is endless, perfect, and the information perfectly is processed instantly what occurs is that the information/divine attribute change occurs instantaneously, all of the logoi being within communication they naturally form a similar spiral of all logoi structures communicating at once. This being instant means that each divine attribute is in a perpetual state of change, becoming every other divine attribute, and each other divine attribute doing the same, and as this occurs instantly in a divine-presentness, a divine stillness, all of the facets are naturally identical to all other facets always, for they express and transmute into all other facets. Just as difference is the heart of normative spiral time, divine instant Omni-form transmutation is the heart of the Divne-Spirial-time.
Therefore just as normative Kether is reflected in normative daat, we can demonstrate that the center and heart of the logos from which its Omni-form divine attributes are expressed, are reflected perfectly within this principle of divine-self-differentiation, meaning we have uncovered a True Daat which exists within the supreme mauve zone, Which is pervading the entirety of the Gem. For this reason each facet is utterly in movement and activity and yet perfect stillness, for each facet is perfectly Active for it is being changed and absorbed into by every other facet, and yet it is perfectly reactive for it is submitting and being integrated into every other facet at once. As such all possible facets are in a perpetual state of marriage of active/reactive force. This is why shiva dances.
This being realized, every facet expresses the fullness of pure sosein, every facet expresses the fullness of aussersein, all ain and all becoming-being, all of the logos is expressed in every singular divine attribute, and the power/manifestation of this logos expresses the entirety of sosein. Every single experience can be perceived as the totality of the Gem.
Difference if analyzed in itself, reveals that difference-in-itself is the very empirical Ego, for what other experience and concept defines itself by saying “this is different from myself”? None. Therefore we find the dynamic Shakti-Dance of Difference-in-objects which is the process-unfolding of object-awareness married to the static Shiva-rest difference-in-itself which is the ego as center of the ever moving circle. Difference logically then is da’ath to the sosein of Kether, which is logically speaking identical to the ultimate essence-existence, for it is consciousness itself and the characteristic of BEING characteristic, for characteristic is transcendental being only revealed via the immanent nature of difference, transcendental Ego the sole aspect of which is being a transcendental ego, its only characteristic being that it is a characteristic, is itself characteristic-in-itself. For this is why it is called both empty and fullness, Diamond and adamantine. Transcendental Ego is the Heart of Characteristic.
THE THREE FOLD Phenomenological reduction of the states of the ego and its corollary to the heart of differentiation found in the experience of all things:
Phenomenological reduction inducing discovery of a transcendental-immanent God by raw analysis.
Analyzing my own self and consciousness, I can say about consciousness that all consciousness is consciousness of something. Whenever I am conscious, I am aware of something, some object or some characteristics. I am always aware of some object.
Analyzing the contents of my awareness, I see objects, all objects seemingly share the following characteristics without exception. The characteristic of having a characteristic. (Encoding data, denoting something, the object makes me aware of certain qualities/data.) the Characteristic of sharing the same basic structure and the characteristic of difference (the objects seem different to each other and over time are changed due to the nature of time.)
The quality of Characteristic seems to be universal to all objects, everything has something which one can say of it, even if what one can say is precisely that they cannot accurately communicate it. As such things like lack and void appear to be characterized by the lack of other characteristics for example.
What then can I say about the characteristics of various objects in my perception? I can say they all seem to adhere to the same basic structure.
By structure I mean, I can look at an object and say it has position, shape, length, fundamentally this means we can measure mathematical data of any object before my eyes, as such we can say that all things give us data as to its basic structure (which is chiefly mathematical/extension based) analyzing data further however reveals there are structures which are not just existent to me as size, height, etc, but rather have a existence according to a mental structure. When I look at red I materially/physically see this color but mentally, my mind associates red with power, or love or color or honesty. As such we can now see that there are principally two structures by which we are aware of objects, the material exist as it appears before us according to mathematical data, and the mental existence as it appears before us which has qualities which do not necessarily equate to the possible mathematical structures whatsoever but seem to have their own divisions, counting methods dividing methods and so forth.
This seems to reveal that all that is actual/real within the material/mathematic seems to be necessarily existent within the Mental world, whereas my mental structures have a much greater range and size(I can imagine people and things which do not exist materially , objects and ideas which have no material being+all material being)
The mental structure being able to contain the mathematical data/materially/empirically experienceable tells us that there appears to be multiple structuring methods of perceiving and interacting with objects. In my experience neither the mental world nor material perception have precedence to each other, they seem to occur at once and aren’t really separate in my awareness of any particular material object.
Since we can perceive of structures which are non-existent within the material experience, which are real structures, and we can contemplate other forms of material which are not coherent with the material structure, we seem to find that there are seemingly nigh-endless and inexhaustible combinations of material into uniquely existing mental structures.
If I were to learn some mental discipline, such as math and physics, or philosophy or the arts, I would find my mental world changed and its capacity and even structure as now seemingly different and its range of contents and principles also seem changed. As there are seemingly inexhaustible material data recombinations which can exist within the mental world, and the mental world can seemingly be changed in its basic principles, we must logically conclude there are inexhaustible potential mental structures which would mean there are potentially endless ways of mentally structuring the connotations and characteristics of material objects and endless ways of arranging mental constructs, this my own contemplation demonstrates the mental capacity for the mental world to contain boundless mental-structures. As such the characteristics and specific data any object gives can be conceived of and interacted with in potentially endless mental ways, as the mental world and material sense are one thing in any experience I hold, it is necessarily true that this structure, this logical-structure must be endless. The structure itself being one unfolding of self-similar patterns unveiling in a process by this I mean, the structure as a whole never divides from itself but rather shows its same principles and qualities over and over, for it is one thing always.
Now, what can I say about difference? Though the structure always reveals the same qualities it always reveals it by showing its diversity, the multiplicity of material objects all reveal the uniformity of mathematical coordinates via their differences in expression, in relation to each other.
Going further, any object I perceive of is inherently different in data/qualities which it encodes from one moment to the next, as time itself is a variable, so the very existence in time means that from on moment to the next, every single object becomes different in some characteristic or another. Analyzing time, I can only perceive of a future which is oncoming, and a past which has occurred. I cannot find any stability in the present because it is constantly passing into past-future. Therefore present itself is the difference/change of characteristic between past-future.
As all characteristics demonstrate themselves via their difference from each other, and each thing’s characteristic is changed instantly, where then can we locate the location of difference itself, difference as it exists purely in both material and mental experience?
If I look at all objects and characteristics the thing within my consciousness which naturally gives the data/encodes that it is different, is me, myself. Specifically my conception of self(my empirical ego, my identity) its very nature seems to be in experience the quality of being different from all other objects. It says “ this is not I, that is not I, I am I and nothing else is I” therefore the Ego itself appears to be difference as it exists purely within my experience, it is Uniqueness itself.
Analyzing further, this seems to reveal that all objects within my consciousness are a dynamic moving difference, dynamic because my mental structures and mental perception can change towards them, and their material conditions are constantly always changing via the nature of the present.
Meanwhile the Core characteristic of my identity/ego remains perpetually within Stasis, its sole quality being that it is unique and different from all objects.
As such analyzing the ego further, we find that the object of difference-in-itself is the Ego, since we have located difference and ego we can now clearly say that all objects within perception and the subject/ego in perception are both just aspects of perception/consciousness, neither being prior or after the other, they are both necessary characteristics of consciousness which is Pure(neither subject nor any specific object but the totality of consciousness is married as such.)
Therefore we can say logically via analysis that phenomena itself depicts characteristic, structure and difference.
As previously stated we can clearly demonstrate a material structure, even if we were to not consider the consciousness and not consider the subject, If objects exist they necessarily must have a structure, that structure must logically unveil via a pattern-process, that pattern process necessitates the existence of difference, difference necessitates the existence of that which is uniquely different to all else, that uniquely existent object which is non-separate to the material-structuring force is agreed upon by all religions to be God, which has, necessarily via the existence of difference, been proven to logically occur as the difference as it exists within itself.
This existence, which we call The unique difference, is inherently non-separate to the entirety of the structuring principles, for examining my own unique difference, I notice my own qualities as existent as separate yet as my own and of me and my own nature. Therefore the material/mental structure as it exists outside of me, must also logically contain an “I” who refers to the entirety of the structuring principles as theirs, and of themselves and of their power, all objects being objects of their perception.
However just as I determined that my own Ego/identity is necessarily a reflection of the consciousness, so must it also be with the ego of the structures. The Identity of the structure must have a non-conceptual existence which it itself reflects, these two, the fully transcendent (above identity, above difference, containing all difference) must logically co-contemplate/dwell with each other, the normative Ego of the structure being the sentience of difference itself, whereas the transcendental Ego is the sentience of characteristic as a whole, for all differences are simply aspects of characteristic itself.
Contemplating my own self once more, my own physical body, my bodily-self, my sense of self, I seem to also have within my consciousness a ego which has no identity, my physical body reacting to object stimuli as if it was itself a non-subject aspect, acting automatically and without reference to the identity. And as previously established there is logically no separation between my perception of objects and my consciousness, as consciousness is awareness and awareness is awareness of objects, rather, awareness of the dynamic process of the unfolding characteristics of Not-I, of objects. My identity and my actual consciousness reflect each other solely by the relationship they have via their shared static nature in contrast to the dynamism of object/not-I.
As demonstrated before, the Ego of the difference and transcendental person of the characteristic itself share this same arrangement, which necessitates the existence of one such not-I of transcendental characteristic, this must logically fill the entirety of material/mental structure world, as it is truly non-separate from the transcendental Person, it necessarily must have sentience and consciousness of equal level also.
As such, we can demonstrate the perpetual co-existence and co-dependence of a Triune-Being who is identical to the structuring principle controlling force of all which exists, who contains all possible characteristics therefore all attributes, is necessarily boundless for he is all structure, is necessarily in all points of time via the identification of time with difference, and is necessarily having three persons which are of one divine essence yet three distinct persons who, mutually reflecting each other are never mingled into a fourth person or essence.
Thus, a fully Transcendental immanent Trinitarian Godhead is Necessary.
Zothyrian Revisionist 